Why Taskaty
Your Tools Aren't Broken. They Just Don't Talk to Each Other.
Your contracts live in PDFs. Your projects live in one tool. Your invoices live in another. Every handoff is a place where revenue leaks. Taskaty seals those gaps — by connecting every stage in a single system built for how service firms in Saudi Arabia actually work.
The Real Problem
Sound Familiar?
These aren't edge cases. They're the weekly reality for every service firm running on disconnected tools.
📄
Contracts that don't flow anywhere
A signed contract is a PDF in someone's inbox. The project team never sees the agreed scope. Billing starts from memory — and estimates drift.
↑ 34% of billing disputes trace back here
⏱
Hours tracked but never billed
Time is logged, but reconciling timesheets to invoices is a manual process. Hours fall through cracks every month. Revenue walks out the door silently.
↑ Avg SAR 150K lost per firm per year
🔄
Re-entering the same data everywhere
Proposal numbers typed into the project tool, then re-typed into the invoice. Each transfer is a new chance for an error — and a new source of disputes.
↑ 6+ hrs/month per PM on reconciliation
📧
Your Clients Don't Know What's Happening — So They Email. Constantly.
Every status email you send is proof that your client can't see your work in real time. That's not a communication problem — it's a visibility architecture problem.
↑ 3–5 hrs/week spent on client updates
Why Taskaty Wins
Four Structural Differences That Change How Your Firm Works
These are not feature comparisons. They are architectural decisions that determine whether your firm bleeds revenue or holds it.
★★★★★ 4.8 · G2
SOC 2 Type II
ZATCA ✓
1
Data inheritance — not data entry
When a contract is signed, every downstream stage — project, tasks, time, invoice — inherits the agreed numbers automatically. You agree once. The system enforces it everywhere, forever.
2
Built for service operations — not adapted for them
Taskaty wasn't a generic project tool that bolted on invoicing. It was designed around the service delivery lifecycle from day one. Proposals → Contracts → Projects → Time → Invoices is structural, not a workaround.
3
A client portal that actually builds trust
Your clients log in and see their project status, team, milestones, and can message the PM directly. When clients feel informed, they stop emailing — and they renew.
4
Saudi-first compliance — built in, not bolted on
ZATCA e-invoicing, Saudi VAT (15%), Arabic RTL interface, SAR as default currency. These aren't add-ons or plugins. They're in the core of the product — baked into the data model itself.
How We Compare
How We Compare
Taskaty vs. The Alternatives
Capability
Taskaty
Project Tools (e.g. Asana, Monday)
Finance Tools (e.g. Zoho Books, QuickBooks)
Client → Contract → Invoice (native flow)
✓ Native
✗
✗
Time tracking → Invoice (zero re-entry)
✓ Structural
Partial
✗
Client portal with direct chat
✓ Native
✗
✗
ZATCA e-invoicing
✓ Certified
✗
Some
Arabic RTL interface
✓ Full RTL
✗
Partial
Additive RBAC (no deny-rule conflicts)
✓ Additive
Basic
Basic
Zero revenue leakage (structural)
✓ Guaranteed
✗
✗
Built natively for Saudi Arabia
✓ Native
✗
✗
ZATCA — built-in
✓ Certified
✗
Partial
Make the Switch
Stop Leaving Revenue on the Table.
14-day free trial. Setup in 30 minutes. No credit card. ZATCA-compliant from day one.
600+ service teams active
Setup in 30 minutes
ZATCA Compliant